<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GallagherPhoto//blog &#187; advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gallagherphoto.com/blog/archives/category/advertising/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gallagherphoto.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:24:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>photo- rant 1.0</title>
		<link>http://gallagherphoto.com/blog/archives/185</link>
		<comments>http://gallagherphoto.com/blog/archives/185#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 07:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert Gallagher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gallagherphoto.com/blog/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A friend recently posted this link on facebook, which lead to an interesting discussion about real vs unreal, as used in the (mainly advertising) media today. Now I&#8217;m told it turns out this is apparently a &#8216;not- real&#8217; moment, or a created video, made by Gatorade, which has gone viral, which of course was the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GOapFpjmVA8&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GOapFpjmVA8&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>A friend recently posted this link on facebook, which lead to an interesting discussion about real vs unreal, as used in the (mainly advertising) media today. Now I&#8217;m told it turns out this is apparently a &#8216;not- real&#8217; moment, or a created video, made by Gatorade, which has gone viral, which of course was the intention in the first place. But the question is this: At what point do they become in-effective and therefore pointless, and in fact just plain stupid. Now I get that the point is to &#8216;wow&#8217; us, but when you&#8217;ve seen so many just not possible things,  it becomes tiresome to me, and therefore probably almost everyone else out there. I mean, now were seeing countless babies breakdancing, day- trading etc etc. I mean, come on! Cheap, tacky, creatively lazy. I think it was effective a few years back, when Nike showed a video of Michael Vick throwing a football beyond the stadium walls. And that worked, because the wow factor had traction. But these days, it&#8217;s just so gimmicky and cheap. This is why i honestly believe the need for &#8216;true&#8217; imagery will always have legs. It&#8217;s like this is the current &#8216;photoshop&#8217; filter du jour, a fad that i hope will soon run it&#8217;s life- cycle. Remember a few years back when everyone was producing high contrast, desaturated images? That soon went away. The same will be said for gimmicky, ridiculous, over- exagerated footage. Because at some point, it&#8217;s human nature to say &#8221; Ok, that was fun, but show me something i can actually connect with.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gallagherphoto.com/blog/archives/185/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

